Wisconsin Supreme Court Candidate Brad Schimel Sparks Controversy Over Interracial Marriage Stance

In a controversial statement, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel expressed that he would have supported a ban on interracial marriage in the 1950s. If elected, Schimel indicated he might vote to reinstate such a ban should a related case appear before him. This alarming position has sparked widespread debate and concern among voters, emphasizing the potential impact on marriage rights in Wisconsin. With the election approaching, Schimel’s stance has become a focal point, prompting discussions on civil rights and judicial responsibilities. Stay informed about this critical issue affecting marriage equality and the future of Wisconsin’s legal landscape.

BREAKING- THEY ARE COMING AFTER YOUR MARRIAGE!

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel said today that he would have defended a ban on interracial marriage in the 1950s. If he is elected, and a case comes in front of him, he will vote to reinvoke the ban!

Your thoughts pic.twitter.com/GhkXk3prJy

— Lovable Liberal and his Old English sheepdog (@DougWahl1) March 15, 2025

BREAKING- THEY ARE COMING AFTER YOUR MARRIAGE!

Hey there, folks! Have you heard the latest buzz? It’s causing quite a stir! Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel has made some waves with his recent comments. In a rather [controversial statement](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/wisconsin-supreme-court-candidate-controversy-rcna2642), Schimel mentioned that he would have defended a ban on interracial marriage back in the 1950s. Whoa, right? And, get this, if elected and a case lands on his desk, he might actually vote to reinvoke the ban. It’s like turning back the clock on decades of progress!

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel said today that he would have defended a ban on interracial marriage in the 1950s.

So, here’s the scoop. Schimel’s comments have sent shockwaves across the state and beyond. It’s not every day you hear someone openly talk about supporting something so controversial. Many people are scratching their heads, wondering what this could mean for the future of marriage equality. Could this be a step back in time? It’s a hot topic that’s got everyone talking.

If he is elected, and a case comes in front of him, he will vote to reinvoke the ban!

Imagine this scenario: Schimel gets elected, and a case challenging interracial marriage lands in his courtroom. According to his statements, he might actually vote to bring back the ban. It’s a jaw-dropping thought, isn’t it? [Marriage equality](https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/15/politics/marriage-equality-controversy/index.html) has been a battle long fought, and just when we thought we were moving forward, this news hits. It’s like stepping into a time machine and landing in a different era. How do you feel about that?

Your thoughts

Let’s dive into the conversation, shall we? What do you think about Brad Schimel’s stance? Some folks are outraged, while others are concerned about what this could mean for future legal decisions. This is a topic that affects a lot of people, and it’s important to share your thoughts. Whether you’re in favor of marriage equality or believe in traditional values, this is a discussion that impacts us all.

So, there you have it, folks. The latest buzz from Wisconsin that’s got everyone talking. It’s a reminder that even today, [the debate over marriage equality](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2023/03/15/debate-over-marriage-equality-reignites-amid-new-comments/) continues. Let’s keep the conversation going and find out where people stand on this issue. What are your thoughts?