Breaking News: FBI’s New Head Calls January 6 Protesters "Domestic Terrorists"

In a shocking revelation, Steve Jensen, the newly appointed head of the FBI’s Washington Field Office, reportedly labeled January 6 protesters as "Goddamn domestic terrorists" during a recent hearing. This explosive statement emerged from transcripts obtained by the Federal Watchdog from Jim Jordan’s Weaponization Hearing. Jensen’s comments have raised significant concerns regarding the FBI’s approach to those involved in the Capitol riot, as he emphasized intentions to "round them all up." The discourse surrounding this sensitive topic continues to ignite debate over law enforcement’s responses to political protests in the United States. Stay updated for further developments.

BREAKING: New head of the FBI Washington Field Office STEVE JENSEN is documented calling January 6ers

“Goddamn domestic Terrorists & we’re gonna round them all up”

Federal Watchdog @FederalWD obtained these new transcripts from Jim Jordan’s WEAPONIZATION Hearing!!! pic.twitter.com/g1OcH4c28M

— Jake Lang – January 6 Political Prisoner (@JakeLangJ6) April 9, 2025

BREAKING: New head of the FBI Washington Field Office STEVE JENSEN is documented calling January 6ers

In an explosive revelation, new transcripts have surfaced from the ongoing investigations into the January 6th insurrection, showcasing the views of the newly appointed head of the FBI Washington Field Office, Steve Jensen. The transcripts reveal Jensen referring to individuals involved in the January 6 events as “Goddamn domestic Terrorists” and indicating intentions to “round them all up.” This statement has sparked outrage and concern among various groups and individuals, raising critical questions about the FBI’s approach to political dissent and the law enforcement’s handling of perceived threats.

“Goddamn domestic Terrorists & we’re gonna round them all up”

The language used by Steve Jensen is particularly striking. It illustrates a stark divide in how federal officials perceive the January 6 participants. Jensen’s comments, as reported by @FederalWD, were unveiled during Jim Jordan’s WEAPONIZATION Hearing, a platform that has been scrutinizing the alleged politicization of federal law enforcement. This isn’t just another political statement; it reflects a significant stance from someone in a pivotal position of power within the FBI. The rhetoric used here raises alarms about the potential for overreach and the implications for civil liberties.

Federal Watchdog @FederalWD obtained these new transcripts from Jim Jordan’s WEAPONIZATION Hearing!!!

These new transcripts, obtained by the Federal Watchdog, provide a glimpse into the mindset of federal law enforcement regarding the Capitol riots. The characterization of January 6 participants as “domestic terrorists” can lead to severe consequences, both legally and socially. Many argue that such labeling can exacerbate the already heated political climate in the U.S. and may result in disproportionate responses from law enforcement agencies. The implications of Jensen’s statements are vast, affecting not only those involved in the January 6 events but also raising concerns for future protests and political gatherings.

The Reaction to Jensen’s Comments

In light of Jensen’s comments, reactions from various political figures and civil rights organizations have been swift. Critics argue that equating political dissent with domestic terrorism undermines the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Many are calling for transparency and accountability regarding how the FBI is handling cases related to January 6 and beyond. The public’s trust in federal agencies is at stake, and many are demanding to know how far the FBI plans to go in pursuing these individuals labeled as threats.

What’s Next for the FBI and January 6 Investigations?

The fallout from Jensen’s statements will likely continue to unfold as more information comes to light. The handling of the January 6 investigations will be under increased scrutiny, especially as more transcripts from the hearings are released. The debate surrounding the balance between national security and civil liberties will be at the forefront of discussions, challenging both lawmakers and citizens to consider the implications of labeling dissent as terrorism. As we navigate these complex issues, it’s crucial to remain informed and engaged, particularly as new developments arise.